hit counter code ONE NATION BEENLEIGH NEWS

UPDATE

WWW.NATIONUPDATE.COM.AU

BEENLEIGH, REGIONAL & STATE NEWS LETTER

Volume 2 issue 22, November 2009

President & editor: Colin Law. VP: John Walter.

Secretary: Anne Law. Ph/fax 07-55462571.

Email: colin.law@lizzy.com.au

Treasurer: Fred Pitt, ph. 07-38040061

Next Branch meeting: Wed, 16th December at 2pm.

1a John Lane, Beenleigh.

THE VOICE OF THE PEOPLE

Major Policies

BANK & TAX REFORM, DEBIT TAX ELIMINATES ALL GOVERNMENT TAXES PAY ONLY 1% TAX,

REDUCE PETROL PRICE TO 50 CPL, DIESEL 40 CPL, LPG 20 CPL, BETTER ROADS, NO TOLLS.

MORE REAL JOBS & JOB SECURITY.

PROPERTY RIGHTS, JUSTICE, FAMILY VALUES.

CAPPING OF ELECTORAL FUNDING.

FREE STANDARD HOSPITAL & MEDICARE.

IMPROVED EDUCATION SYSTEM & APPRENTICE TRAINING.

FAIR TRADE, NO GLOBALISM, NO SALE OF PUBLIC ASSETS, NO MULTICULTURISM.

PROTECTION OF ENVIRONMENT, HABITAT, WATER, & NATIONAL PARKS. NO CARBON TAX SCAM, CHEAPER CLEAN ELECTRICITY.

SECURITY ON THE STREET,IN THE HOME, IN RETIREMENT.

BULL SHIT

The time has come to rid ourselves of the bull shit feed to us by the media, labor/liberals & greens.

K-Rudd is off to Copenhagen to sign our country away to UN world government & carbon taxes to pay for it. Anna Bligh has bank-rupted Queensland and is selling of your assets, and land rights to pay the interest on the burgeoning debt.

Both have sold you out taken away your sovereign rights. ONE NATION is the only party to oppose them, support us & save your country.

JUSTICE QUEENSLAND STYLE

On Friday 6 November 2009, the Supreme Court of Queensland bottomed out.

In the Toowoomba Registry, Court Room No.1, forty five people witnessed what can only be described as a blatant miscarriage of justice by Supreme Court Judge, Justice Douglas.

Case No. S37/09-Barton-v –Beattie. Bligh, Fraser and Pitt was dismissed by Justice Douglas… and it was painfully obvious to all present, that his decision had been made before he walked into the courtroom.

It was also very clear that his decision had nothing to do with the law, but appeared to be motivated by another agenda, as the judge made several "errors at law" for which it is envisaged, he will be accountable.

The case, filed by Chriss Barton of Clifton, alleged that the four respondents; Ex-Premier Peter Beattie, Premier Anna Bligh, Treasurer Andrew Fraser and Ex-Minister Warren Pitt all committed crimes against the Constitution of Australia, especially in respect of Council Amalgamations which were forced onto the people of Queensland without a referendum and also against a majority will of the people, which was established by plebiscites (referendum) authorised by the Federal Government and carried out by the Australian Electoral Commission.

In all, there were 8 orders sought, including several for the court to issue orders relating to the restitution of the Clifton Shire. This of course would be dependent on whether or not the court found that the respondents had committed offences against the Commonwealth, as mentioned above.

The nature of these allegations is very serious. It is no wonder then, that the judge avoided them like the plague and chose the erroneous path of "restitution of council" as the basis for his decision. Any pretence that that this decision had legal merit, or that the court was properly conducted, was totally lacking and the judge showed almost no acting ability in trying to convey any hint that this was nothing more than a "snow job".

He better not loose his job as a judge for the government- he won’t get one as an actor.

The usual procedure for such a court hearing is that the parties before the court make their opening statements and the any discussion involving questions, challenges or clarifications is carried out with the judge asking questions to ensure that he has a clear understanding of all matters involved.

Chris Barton gave the counsel for the respondents the opportunity to speak first. Just as well this happened as the barrister would not get to say or do much more for the next two hours. He was about to enjoy one of the easiest court appearance he has ever had to make. He spoke for some 10 – 15 minutes and then answered a couple of simple, well-chosen questions from the judge – a little role-play invoked by the judge.

Then it was Chris Batons turn. He started to make his opening statement and when he took his second breath, the judge pounced on him and started to interrogate him about one point in the orders sought by the Originating Application – the matter of restoring the Clifton Council.

It is clear that tis can only be considered once the respondents have been found guilty of committing a crime against the Commonwealth. Yet the judge demanded that Chris Barton explain what the Judge was required to do about the restoration of Clifton Shire.

It is clear that this can only be considered once the respondents have been found guilty of committing a crime against the Commonwealth. Yet the judge demanded that Chris Barton explain what the judge was required to do about the restitution of Clifton Shire.

He also stated that this point was a political matter and that he was not concerned about political matters, only legal ones.

When Chris Barton raised the point that there was a question about the breaching of the Constitution of Australia, Justice Douglas said that this was not a matter he could rule on – it was not his jurisdiction and he would not be concerned about it.

Chris Barton however, stated that this was in fact the whole point of the case and that it must be considered at this time.

Justice Douglas raised his voice and, using a very annoyed tone, told Mr Barton that he would not entertain repetitious argument in his court and that Mr. Barton had better get on to his next point.

The fact that the judge had repetitiously bought up the same single point from the eight orders sought, did not faze him and allowed all those present to witness his hypocrisy.

Justice Douglas had obviously charted a course which he would follow to try and give his predetermined and prejudiced decision some respectability and no matter what Chris Barton bought up as an argument, the discussion went back to what the judge wanted to discuss.

Then the issue of the respondents breaching section 92 of the Local Government Act 1993 came up. This legislation required that a compulsory referendum be held in respect of a local government area (council or shire) being abolished and absorbed into another local government area. It was in effect well before the forced council amalgamations were publicly announced and stayed in force until 1 July 2009 when the local Government Act 1993 was replaced by the new Local Government Act 2009.

Neither the judge not the counsel for the respondents had any answer to this. The judge looked lost and appealed to the barrister to offer him some way out, but none was forthcoming. Then, he got an idea – to seek clarification of the word "committee" as it was defined in that particular legislation. The respondents’ barrister got the message and sought time to use the court’s library to access a copy of the Act.

The judge adjourned the court and both he and the barrister left the courtroom.

When they returned, the judge made mention of the fact that he would only consider a part of the orders sought under the Originating Application as he had no jurisdiction over the other and on the basis of that he ruled that the case be dismissed.

Some 45 people had just witnessed a travesty of justice. A judge had said that he was not entitled to rule on certain matters in a case and that he would simply ignore these and dismiss the entire matter.

This is criminal. If he could not rule on certain matters, he could not rule on the matter as a whole. However, this judge had come to the Supreme Court in Toowoomba on a mission – to throw out Chris Barton’s case against Beattie, Bligh, Fraser and Pitt.

He had mentioned that the State Government was entitled to do as it liked in respect of

Local Government. He also endorsed a statement contained in the Respondents submissions, prepared by the Crown Law that read:

"THERE CAN BE NO DOUBT THAT THE QUEENSLAND PARLIAMENT MAY VALIDLY ENACT LAWS WHICH ADVERSELY AFFECT THE INTERESTS, RIGHTS AND PROPERTY OF PERSONS, WHETHER OF PROSPECTIVE OR RETROSPECTIVE EFFECT, WITH OR WITHOUT COMPENSATION".

If you are a Queenslander, how do you feel about this statement?

How do you feel that your interests, rights and property can be adversely affected by the State Government?

Will you be able to sleep a t night, knowing that the Queensland State Government can take away all that’s yours… without you having any right to do anything about it?

Most importantly the government has taken away the sovereign rights of the people.

In summary it appears that the Queensland government is running a dictatorship they control the justice system the Supreme Court is there to see their will is enforced and the people of Queensland have no constitutional or sovereign rights.

This case is not final it is only the beginning of the restoration of the constitutional sovereign rights of the people. Chris needs your support to take this case forward to the high court. If you feel you would like to offer legal, moral or financial assistance please contact our office.

CARBON TAX REAL COSTS

Both weather and climate are considered to be chaotic, as they are characterized by non-linear models with high sensitivity to unknown initial conditions. The effect of Carbon Tax and trade falls into this same category. The dozens, if not hundreds, of vagaries of the proposed scam along with the unknown reaction by multiple sets of producers and consumers, make the costs of the scam very difficult to estimate.

In an attempt to do so, let’s consider what is probably the most significant cost factor: the cost of CO2 tax. Using $100/ton and information from the Energy Information Agency (EIA), we can estimate what this will cost the average family of four when any rebates run out. Our hypothetical family has two cars, one for Dad who drives 12,000 miles and the other for Mum who does 10,000 miles per year. He uses 667 gallons of petrol and she uses 636. Twenty pounds of CO2 are generated for each gallon of petrol burned. With a tax of $100 per ton of CO2 the increase in price for petrol would be $1 per gallon or $1,303 for this family. If their suburban home is heated by natural gas their increase would be $519.

The average electricity customer uses about 12,000 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity per year (except for Al-Gore who used 221,000 kWh in 2006) our family of four would use something in the order of 20,000kWh. Our normal electricity bill for 20,000kWh at $.08 per/kWh would be $1,600 per year. But the surcharge for CO2 emissions would be $.11 per kWh, resulting in a $3,800 bill. With the government pushing green electricity the cost of electricity will climb to $.40 per kWh plus CO2 Tax $.11 per kWh making a total of $.51 per kWh.

This doesn’t count the increase in the price of virtually every consumer product the family buys, since all products have some degree of energy content. All in all we are in the range of over $50 billion dollars for 40 years or over $5000 per year for each tax payer. And for What purpose?

To pay for UN world global government and to fatten the pockets of those brokers trading in it such as Goldman Sacks, little wonder Malcolm Turnball and some of the Liberals are backing K-Rudd and Wrong.

ELECTRICITY BILLS VERIFY BLIGHS LIES

Anna Bligh promised that the privatising of electricity retailers would provide competition and reduce price.

First Lie: Check out all the suppliers in Queensland their prices are all the same for Domestic Tariff -11.

Second Lie: Power Prices will be reduced.

In fact they have risen from 10 cents Kwh to 18.843 cents kWh, prices have nearly doubled and we have yet to cop carbon taxes.

GREEN JOBS

You may have seen Anna Bligh and K-Rudd jumping up and down and shouting "Jobs, jobs, jobs!" whilst promoting the carbon tax scam.

Though many Australians still believe that wind and solar power are to be our energy salvation, few understand anything at all about our energy-distribution system. Solar arrays don’t work very well at night, and windmills aren’t of much use unless the wind is blowing at a relatively brisk rate. (Most don’t develop rated output until wind speed reaches 29 mph.). Electricity consumers, however expect that even on calm nights their lights will work. And street lights, traffic lights, hospitals, police stations, and many commercial and industrial concerns that operate around the clock ought to function too.

Because they generate electricity only intermittently, wind and solar installations have not replaced a single power plant and, unless an efficient way to store massive amounts of electrical energy is discovered, will not do so.

Green energy sources often praised by politicians and the media would not exist without massive subsidies. It’s more likely that "green jobs" refer to new jobs in the massive bureaucracies necessary to issue emission allocations and police the energy used by all Australian businesses, and doubtlessly soon, Australian households. The Energy Police would not only monitor use, but also ascertain that the credits being sold were from bona fide "green" sources or determine tat the originator wasn’t really cheating on that end transaction-a daunting task even for a massive bureaucracy.

TYRE INDUSTRY VICTIM TO CARBON TAX

Bridgestone Tyres falls victim to K-Rudds carbon tax, announced the closure of all its manufacturing plants in Australia, throwing 600 workers out of a job.

The tyre industry is a major user of carbon and the ETS (extra tax system) has made tyre manufacturing in Australia uneconomical. This but one of the many industries that will be forced to close putting thousands of people out of work.

Bridgestone is the last of the once many tyre manufacturers we once had in Australia, we can no longer manufacture tyres here thanks to the excellent job the labor government has done in destroying our industries.

MUSLIM INVASION

Forty two Muslim illegals to be allowed into Australia. Maybe we should learn from Denmark’s experience?

The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its brand of socialist liberation one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929-q system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at that time.

Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies- it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrivals plus additional perk in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturism. How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets- all because its commitment to multiculturism would come back to bite?

By the 1990’s the growing urban Muslim population was obvious – and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish Society was obvious.

Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim-exclusive enclaves. AS the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark’s liberal way of life, the Danes – once so welcoming – began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long–standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history.

In an article they reported:

‘Muslim immigration constitutes 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending.’

‘Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark’s 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country’s convicted rapist, practically all victims are non-Muslim. Similar disproportions are found in other crimes’.

‘Over time as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population’.

‘Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark’s Muslim population grows large enough. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 10 years will be Muslim.’

In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years-one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration policies in Europe.

If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark’s history, culture, and a Danish language test. You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship. You must demonstrate intent to work and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must be both over 24 years of age, and you won’t find it so easy anymore to move friends and family to Denmark with you. You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen.

In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederikson, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigration on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government’s welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75% of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system, as it existed, was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government.

A large thorn in the side of Denmark’s imams is the Minister of Immigration an Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy towards immigration that has put her life at risk.

Many European countries are facing the same problems from the planned Muslim invasion. For example those who watch English shows such as the "Bill" find the indigenous Englishman is now becoming rare. Canadians clamour for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the dole. As we in Australia look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history.

Don’t expect our current two party political system to take steps to protect indigenous Australians from the contrived Muslim invasion that has resulted in enclaves and ghettoes rife with crime that are no-go areas for Australians. Where they gather in mosques plotting campaigns of terror to destroy our country and impose their evil cult and laws on us all.

&#One Nation as usual has been denigrated with all the usual racist slurs for its immigration policy of compatibility and to halt the current influx until such time as the country can sustain more immigrants.

INVASION

On top of the Muslim invasion we now have a Tamil invasion. The Tamils originate from southern India they have invaded Ceylon, Fiji and other countries.

If you look at the map of Sri Lanka (formally Ceylon) you will notice the short distance from the formally held territory of the Tamil Tigers in northern Sri Lanka and the mainland of India at Rameswaram.

Rameswaram together with Kashi is considered to be one of the holiest places in India to Hindus. Hence, it is a bustling pilgrim centre.

The distance between Sri Lanka at Mannar Island across Paulik Strait and Rameswaram is only 20 kilometres. This part of India is called Tamil Nadu, which is the ancestral homeland of the Tamil Tigers, the same illegal invaders trying to bluff entry into Australia on political asylum grounds.

These are the same Tamil Tigers that mounted a bloody war against many innocent Sri Lankan’s over a period exceeding 30 years. The state in southern India, Tamil Nadu and its people have welcomed the return of the Tamil Tigers to their ancestral homeland but a miracle has happened. Instead of going 20 kilometres back to Tamil Nadu they have got their nautical bearings misinterpreted and have decided to go in mass in the opposite direction past the length of Sri Lanka, open ocean, past Malaysia, open ocean, past Indonesia, open ocean and miracles of all miracles found them selves in the benevolent territorial waters of Australia.

Since K-Rudd Labor Government has made us a soft target, it seems that the taxpayer-funded largess for que jumpers and illegal invaders is boundless.

The official immigration figures are now in excess of 100,000 pa. Unofficially much higher. There are millions of these people wishing to invade us and why not when they exist in India and elsewhere on a few rupees a day. K-Rudd provides them with holiday camps on tropical Christmas Island, free legal assistance, pensions and benefits far beyond what our pensioners have to struggle to survive on.

The time has come to get tough, this invasion is war it is time to get all our defence forces home to protect our own security.

This invasion should be intercepted at our territorial borders and orded to return immediately to whence they came, if the warnings are ignored their vessels will be sunk.

Already our Hospitals social services etc are beyond coping whilst indigenous Australians, many pensioners and poor are doing it tough.

Australia is in serious trouble from the Muslim and Tamil invasion, Jewish/Zionist control of our banking, finance and resources and the UN carbon tax scam to destroy our industries and replace our soverenty with globalism.

There is an answer get rid of the KRudd/Turnbull party.

GOLD COAST INDY DEBARCHAL

This costly waste of money can be traced back to a former division two councillors barney with a visionary citizen Tony Stevens who spent millions of dollars of his own money on his industrial estate to provide us with one of the worlds best motor sports facilities.

But for the actions of this councillor we would not need the expense and disruption that we currently have. It is strongly rumoured that this was the cause of the early untimely death of Tony Stevens.

The week-end racing carnival on the narrow Gold Coast streets has been estimated to cost each and every one in Queensland $50 and a damage bill to the V8’s of about $1 million.

UN CLIMATE CHANGE CONFERENCE IN COPENHAGEN 2009

This coming December our Prime Minister Krudd along with most third world countries and all those that hope to cash in on the greatest scam of all time will sign a treaty to create World Government.

The word "government" actually appears as the first of three purposes of the new entity. The second purpose is the transfer of wealth from the countries of the west to third world countries, in satisfaction of what is called, coyly, "a climate debt" because they claim that harmless essential CO2 is harming the planet and plan to tax it only but not harmful emissions. The third purpose of this new entity, is government, is Enforcement.

KRudd will sign anything, he believes he is beyond the constitution and that the people are no longer sovereign and there is no need for a referendum for the people to decide if they wish to forego their sovereignty to be governed by the UN and be taxed for the privilege. Mr Turnbull is gleefully supporting him as he stands to make a fortune from the scam.

WAKE UP AUSTRALIA BEFORE IT’S TO LATE

START BUILDING YOUR ARK

Al Gore and the carbon tax scammers are predicting a huge rise in our coastal sea levels. However most of those promoting this lie are desperately graving water front land to add to their profits from the scam.

The truth is that if your property is at least two meters above the 1974 flood levels in Queensland you have nothing to worry about. Much of the Gold Coast where developers are selling coastal land is below this level, so buyer bewares.

The Coastal Protection Act and Gold Coast Council Constraint Codes call for buffers from the highest astronomical tides of 30 or 60 metres for minor and major waterways to 400 meters for beach fronts to protect waterways and properties. These distances normally provide sufficient distance and height to protect from the 100 year flood.

However with the exorbanite prices for water front land there is the much graft and corruption in the form of relaxation fees. It makes a lie of Al Gores predictions

REMEMBERANCE DAY

The 11th hour of the 11th month we pause to remember the end of the First World War and all those who never returned. This has been extended in recent years to also remember those who fell in the Second World War and other wars since.

Whilst we think about the fallen we should also think about the causes of these wars and what can be done to prevent further wars and loss of life. Thousands of our best men have been sacrificed in these wars to be replaced by some of the dregs of humanity from those countries in which they fought to protect our country and way of life.

We must also look to history, to find out the cause of wars and those who made huge profits from them. These same people control our banking and finance industry and are bleeding our younger generations for their homes etc. They control our two party political system with the objective to take away our constitutional and sovereign rights and impose global government on us. They are desperate to impose carbon taxes on us, not only to destroy what little industry we have left but to fund UN wars and pay for global government and our destruction.

History shows that no foreign country has conquered Afghanistan but our troops are being sacrificed there to protect UN drug interests.

WE MUST WITHDRAW FROM UN GLOBAL GOVERNMENT

LATE NEWS TRAVERSTON DAM SCRAPPED

One Nation ran a long campaign to scrap the Traverstone Dam, resulting in the Federal Environment Minister announcing that the state government would have to scrap it on environmental grounds.

No wonder the state labor government is in debt over $600 million have been wasted on this project. Typical of labor governments they are still looking at desalination as an alternative when we have available a plentiful supply of top quality potable water from Fraser Island. But you can bet they won’t go down that path as they have sold it under the UN World Heritage Debt for Equity scheme.

Were you given a say at a referendum for the sale of your assets?

ONE NATION MERCHANDISE

Official One Nation Badge $8.00

Shirts: Stylish business type shirts, cotton polyester blend, wash & wear, long or short sleeves, embodied with One Nation Logo, most popular sizes. Price ea. $25.00

Polo Shirts $20.00

Hats: Australian made for protection from our sun, washable & durable felt, ventilated, blue grey colour with One Nation logo, popular sizes. Price ea. $25.00

Stubby holders $2.00.

Advance Australia Fair original. Cassette $2.00.

’22 STEPS TO GLOBAL TYRANNY’ by Graham Strachan. A must read due to the threat of globalism $15

Available from Beenleigh office, payment cash cheque or money order, postage extra.

Stickers available from your branch or Beenleigh office

Disclaimer: In accordance with the rights to speech conferred under the constitution. This newsletter is to keep our members informed, as our only financial & any other obligation is to them. Material in this newsletter is gathered from news & press releases, research & input from members etc, & to our knowledge there is no copyright. Please feel free to distribute or copy any article as this ensures the message getting to our members & public despite the media restrictions. Format is WORD all editorial contributions are welcome.

For those who would like UPDATE its available free via email, please supply your address.

SAVE AUSTRALIA – SUPPORT ONE NATION

Apply for Membership Form

In future membership is free but we would appreciate a donation to wards our administration costs.

The Nation Newspaper, for the uncensored truth.

12 copies $20

ONE NATION

PO Box 1199 Beenleigh QLD 4207

Tel: 07-32874440 Fax: 07-32874448

Email:onenation@optusnet.com.au www.onenationqld.com.au

RETURN TO HOME PAGE